<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://forums.blackbaud.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Jay Love Blog : FEP</title><link>http://forums.blackbaud.com/blogs/jaylove/archive/tags/FEP/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: FEP</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Debug Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>eTapestry is Proud to be a Huge Part of FEP</title><link>http://forums.blackbaud.com/blogs/jaylove/archive/2008/11/18/etapestry-is-proud-to-be-a-huge-part-of-fep.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f90a95a0-00e2-4810-8af8-0bbdde08f853:38108</guid><dc:creator>Jay Love</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://forums.blackbaud.com/blogs/jaylove/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=38108</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://forums.blackbaud.com/blogs/jaylove/archive/2008/11/18/etapestry-is-proud-to-be-a-huge-part-of-fep.aspx#comments</comments><description>
&lt;p&gt;In 2006, AFP and the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy at the Urban Institute in Washington, D.C., launched the innovative annual &lt;a href="http://www.afpnet.org/ka/ka-3.cfm?content_item_id=24159&amp;amp;folder_id=3272"&gt;Fundraising Effectiveness Project (FEP) survey&lt;/a&gt;. By comparing gains and losses in annual giving reported by donor software vendors, the survey helps fundraisers fine-tune their strategies.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This project is truly unique in several key areas.  First, the results are based upon actual data contained in literally thousands of real life nonprofit fundraising databases.  Second, as you will see below, this is one of the times that ardent competitors came together to pool results for the good of our beloved sector.   (I am still not sure some can believe we truly did it.  However, I am personally so proud of our group of vendors for rising to the occasion for such a good cause and dropping most of the petty reasons for not sharing data.)   Third, the results are startling and highlight some key courses of action for nearly every nonprofit engaged in fundraising.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Participating vendors in the AFP Donor Software Workgroup include the following (companies marked with an asterisk are charter members of the AFP donor software workgroup):&lt;br /&gt;
Blackbaud Inc. (The Raiser’s Edge®)*&lt;br /&gt;
Compass Technology&lt;br /&gt;
Donor2/Campus Management Corporation*&lt;br /&gt;
DonorPerfect Fundraising Software*&lt;br /&gt;
eTapestry*&lt;br /&gt;
MatchMaker FundRaising Software*&lt;br /&gt;
Metafile*&lt;br /&gt;
Mission Research (GiftWorks)*&lt;br /&gt;
PhilanthrAppeal (FundTrack Software)*&lt;br /&gt;
ROI Solutions&lt;br /&gt;
Sage Software*&lt;br /&gt;
SofTrek Corporation (PledgeMaker)&lt;br /&gt;
Telosa Software Inc. (Exceed!)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Quite a strange group of bedfellows, would you not agree?   I have to take a moment and brag a little bit about the huge part eTapestry played.  Since our online model of the database application made it literally a single push of the button to participate for our customers, over 2,500 of them did just that!  This definitely helped make the project a success since we provided the lion’s share of the data.  I guess if you are going to brag a little you might as well mention all the key facets.  In addition, eTapestry suggested the key report format used by the project.   It was none other than one of our application’s key Executive Reports called Giving Dynamics.  (See chart below).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In addition, since the FEP project and eTapestry’s customer participation were so successful, we decided to build upon that original concept and create an entire series of reports.  It has become one of our most sought after modules called Benchmark Reporting.    More background details about this exciting module are discussed in the podcast located &lt;a href="http://etapestry.com/node/709"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now for the results  . . .&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They say a picture is worth a thousand words, which is essential in the blogging world since we are not writing novels or for the NY Times.   The chart below reflects the actual Giving Dynamics as of 11/14/2008 comparing the previous year for a random portion of the eTapestry nonprofit customers located in North America.  (Please note: dollars shown are in $000’s).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.etapwss.com/JaysBlogDoNotTouch/aggregateData.gif" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The report reflects a startling bit of news.   Even though all organizations involved in fundraising strive to achieve a majority of fundraising goals in order to extend their mission, most of them lose more dollars from existing and previous donors than they obtain from new and recaptured donors!  This report reflects 1,631 participating organizations with the new, recaptured and upgraded donors in 2008 representing 33 percent of the donors, while the number of lapsed and downgraded donors represents 59 percent of the total!  Similarly, for every new donor gained, the organizations lost more than twice as many.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The true power of such reporting is in comparing your specific organization to the aggregate or to some specific subset meaningful to you.   Subsets such as other organizations in your state or region or in your vertical part of the nonprofit sector reveal just how you are doing and what trends may be affecting you.  Have you ever been in a board meeting where a board member asks how your results compare to other like organizations?   Now you have an easy to use tool to more than answer such a question.  More importantly, you are equipped to respond to or adjust to changes in our sector.  Lastly, you know where to focus your efforts.   A little extra care of existing donors could go a long way in changing the results in next year’s report!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://forums.blackbaud.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=38108" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://forums.blackbaud.com/blogs/jaylove/archive/tags/afp/default.aspx">afp</category><category domain="http://forums.blackbaud.com/blogs/jaylove/archive/tags/eTapestry/default.aspx">eTapestry</category><category domain="http://forums.blackbaud.com/blogs/jaylove/archive/tags/Center+on+Nonprofits+and+Philanthropy/default.aspx">Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy</category><category domain="http://forums.blackbaud.com/blogs/jaylove/archive/tags/FEP/default.aspx">FEP</category></item></channel></rss>