The Thread
Official Blog of the eTapestry Product

What is wrong with "Charity"?

Posted: Sep 18, 2008 by Mike Rusche | with 3 comment(s)
Filed under: ,

Why are we getting so far away from the word charity?  

Why is non-profit the more commonly used description? 

Non-profit?  How boring is that?  Charity is a word derived from a word used for love.  Non-profit?  That’s a government tax category!   “I work for a 501(c)3.  The most important thing is we’re taxed differently.” 

I like big words.  From reading this blog you’ll see that I have very limited ability to use big words, but I like them.  I love when someone throws in a Latin term like ad infinitum or in perpetuity.  But like I said I’m no connoisseur of words.  I did tell a girlfriend in high school that she couldn’t use big words if she couldn’t pronounce them. She said I was the anti-thesis of something.   And she pronounced the anti with a long i.  I told her she read too much.  Then later in life I upgraded my rule to include, if you can’t spell it, don’t use it.

If someone works at a school or a church, they aren’t going to answer the question of where do you work with “At a non-profit”.  Educators are much more proud of the tangible work they provide than to say, “Yep, it’s a tax-exempt organization!”  Not-for-profit.  Woo hoo!!

It’s neat that the word non-profit, despite its negative prefix, is a word that comes with great character.  Now that I think about this I am reminded that a good friend of eTapestry, Tom Suddes, changed what he calls non-profit.  He doesn’t like the word starting negative either and calls you all “For Impact” organizations.    Now that’s it.

Philanthropy.  So, that’s a cool word.  And charity is an awesome word.  I’ve been in the ‘philanthropic’ industry since 1996.   I think a dozen plus years gives me enough experience to be able to recognize that there are so many super hearts at all the charities that are our clients.  And in hearts of those that aren’t.

I think we moved away from it because of it’s Christian origins.  It’s sad that in most things people like to explain the origin of something and how far back it goes.   But if it’s politically incorrect like only this can be, then we need to change the name to something dumb sounding.

Who can put charity back on the street and let people know the word is about compassion?   Tax time is about as dull part of the year as it gets for me.  Don’t tell me your tax status.

It is extremely cool that the work that charities do is so important and admirable, that it does warrant not being taxed by our government.  But let’s focus on the hearts. 

Let’s focus on the charity.

Rick Radcliff
VP of Conversion,  Consulting & Data Services
eTapestry

 


Comments

Jeff Stern said:

I think that rather than the religious undertones, the disuse came from a hope to change the service paradigm.  People working in the social sector wanted to change the idea that there are "haves" and "have-nots" and that the "haves" are inherently better.  Rather than enforcing this social hierarchy, there was a movement I was in the early to mid '90s (alongside the burgeoning PC movement) to change to a language and model that saw service providers and recipients as partners in building stronger communities.  Organizations "flipped the script" and started making "asset maps" in addition to (or sometimes instead of) the traditional "needs assessments."  Working at a volunteer center at that time, we "mobilized community resources" rather than connecting people with charities.  

I think that there is some merit to the idea that service providers (those in the field) and volunteers should look at their work through this lens, rather than the traditional "charity work" lens with its somewhat patronizing connotations of (moral and financial) superiority.  However, from the donor side of things, the word charity is still very powerful (although a new donor demographic prefers to make an "investment" in the community).  

# September 18, 2008 5:58 PM

Elizabeth de Almeida said:

I never thought about the difference between the two. However, upon reading this, I do believe charity is the best word to use.

# January 26, 2009 4:32 PM

alps jain said:

I too agree with Elizabeth

# April 29, 2009 10:04 AM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required) 


Enter the numbers above: