Connections
A blog by Steve MacLaughlin

Blog Info











Blogroll

Social Media is a Big Waste of Time

That's right, I said it. You've all been thinking it. Admit it. A lot of time is spent these days talking about social media and working on social media. But is it all just a big waste of time?

Social media is a big waste of your organization's time if...

  • You haven't clearly defined the audience you're trying to engage
  • You don't have a clear goals for what you want them to do
  • You aren't measuring what people are doing or responding to
  • You haven't defined success and what the value of it is
  • You are only doing this because someone else told you to

Time is probably the most precious resource in the universe. They aren't making any more of it. And organizations are always trying to find ways to do more with less.

If you aren't being focused, goal oriented, measurement minded, and doing it for the right valuable reasons, then your time might be best spent on other endeavors.


Comments

Twitted by nptechblogs said:

Pingback from  Twitted by nptechblogs

# July 10, 2009 9:37 AM

Diana Shipe said:

So true...If only the people trying to push out social media sites/pages would understand this...or be willing to clearly identify those goals and audience.  

# July 10, 2009 10:28 AM

Joe Meehan said:

Great topic; Timely as well.  I see a lot of non-profits (and for profits, too) who've set up a Twitter, cause everyone else has one too.

Some of the roadblocks that I think exist is how to track the success of social media.  We've moved so far from the days of "I sent them a letter (appeal), they sent in a check in the return envelope; success!" that it's now daunting to track everything.

Here's a few questions to ponder: As a NPO, what, if anything, are you doing different between your twitter, your FB page, and your official website?

Should there be different info on each?

I think it's not realistic to think that you should track twitter/FB stuff in hopes of find a donor/prospect.  I think it's fine to ask them once they make a donation "how did you first hear about us?" and if Twitter/FB/web site is listed, great.

I heard one of the team members who ran Obama's campaign talking about how they used Social Media to serve the other aspects of the campaign.  Which made sense.  Need voters in Ohio?  Tweet it.  Need people to attend the fund-raiser in Florida?  FB it.  It served the other aspects of the campaign.  I'd never thought of it that way.

And who handles your social media?  Is it the communications department - or does your development department have input?  

I can't tell you who my audience is at the moment based on the followers of twitter.  I suspect (for us) it's people who want to hear what we're doing. For other orgs, I bet there's more interaction.

I can tell you that I (as a follower) appreciate when people have special offers for my involvement with their social media.  Airlines are offering Twares (tweet'd airfare rates); hotels send me deals via Facebook.  Maybe there's a marketing aspect to that - which NPO's can follow.

But let's also embrace that there are now more avenues than ever before to reach potential donors.  And immediate communications.  Gone are the days of the letter/mailings.  I'm writing this while on a plane, checking my inbox, reading my Facebook, and seeing twitter updates.  

As Steve pointed out, time is the precious resource.  The organizations I support can now reach me so many more amazing ways.

I'd love to hear other org's responses.  Cause I surely don't have all the answers.

# July 10, 2009 10:21 PM

Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation » Blog Archive » Some Helpful Social Media Links said:

Pingback from  Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation  » Blog Archive   » Some Helpful Social Media Links

# July 13, 2009 10:10 AM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required) 


Enter the numbers above: